Pre-development strategy · Now City Labs

Win Shares: where the outcome actually comes from.

Five pre-development decisions account for the majority of value a project delivers.

Most multifamily operators measure outputs: headline rents, absorption velocity, occupancy. The decisions that determine those outputs (unit mix, layout design, amenity selection, brand positioning, listing execution) are made before a building opens and treated as intuition rather than analysis. Win Shares is the analytical method Now City Labs uses to convert pre-development decisions into measured inputs, attribute the value created at lease-up to those inputs, and feed the attribution back into the next project. The data is sitting in public filings, architectural plans, and leasing records that every developer in any market already has. Most of the market is not looking.

The Moneyball insight, applied to development

Measure the inputs that drive outcomes, not just the outcomes themselves.

In 2002, Billy Beane's Oakland Athletics outperformed the league at one of the lowest payrolls in baseball by measuring on-base percentage and runs created rather than batting average and RBIs. The insight was simple: baseball had been measuring the wrong things for decades. Multifamily is in the same place. Headline rents, absorption, and occupancy are outputs. Unit mix, layout, amenity quality, brand positioning, and listing execution are the inputs. The decisions that determine the outputs get made before the building opens, and most of them get made on intuition. The Win Shares strategy treats those decisions as the subject of analysis.

The Charney Companies team published a recent case study from Union Channel, the first building of a five-building campus at Gowanus Wharf in Brooklyn. Union Channel leased 25 percent faster than the competition and achieved rents 10 to 20 percent above market in a leasing environment with seven other lease-ups within three blocks. Five pre-development decisions accounted for 73 percent of the measurable value created during lease-up. The framework below adapts that approach for Now City Labs, applies it to publicly available data, and makes it deployable across both Now City Inc. projects and Labs client engagements.

"What actually drives the outcome?" The data to answer that question exists in every market. Win Shares is the discipline of asking it.

How this connects to the Outcomes framework

Outcomes is the scoreboard. Win Shares is the playbook.

The Outcomes framework measures the fifteen dimensions of what a project delivers (financial returns, civic and climate outcomes, resident-experience outcomes). The Win Shares strategy determines which pre-development decisions deliver each Outcomes dimension. The two are complementary halves of the same analytical discipline.

Outcomes framework

What the project delivers, measured.

Fifteen metrics across capital, civic and climate, and resident-experience. Each metric anchored in a real instrument or framework. Method, sensitivity, and citation paths visible per metric.

Win Shares strategy

What pre-build decisions produce the delivery.

Five pre-development decision categories, each with a documented analytical method, data source, and attribution back to the Outcomes metrics. Compounds across projects as the platform's pipeline grows.

I
Unit mix and program · The largest single lever

Where the gap is between what the market is supplying and what renters actually want.

The competitive set is mappable in granular detail before any project commits to a unit mix. Architectural plans are publicly filed in most jurisdictions. Inferred unit type, average square footage by type, and amenity programs can be extracted across the entire pipeline within walking distance. Demand by unit type can be derived from household composition, employment patterns, and absorption studies. The intersection between the two is where the unit mix decision actually lives.

25 to 35%Typical win share
Method

Map the pipeline. Compare to demand. Address the gap.

Pull architectural plans of every comparable lease-up and pre-development project within walking radius. Map unit mix across the full set. Compare to demand projection derived from household composition data and absorption studies. Identify the gap. Set unit mix to address the gap, not to match the average. Quantify the absorption and rent premium implications of the gap.

Data sources

What powers the analysis

  • Architectural plans from city building permit filings
  • Unit mix and SF data from comparable lease-ups
  • Census ACS household composition data
  • Local absorption studies and rental listings data
  • Internal pipeline tracking across competing projects
Reference case · Union Channel, Brooklyn

3 percent supply versus 14 percent demand on three-bedroom units.

Charney's mix tripled the market average for three-bedrooms, which became the first unit type to fully lease. Studios were tightened to 400 SF (20 percent below market average) but priced only 10 percent below the market on total rent. Both unit types leased more than 50 percent faster than the rest of the building.

Worked example · Now City West Salem

Walkable, design-forward, courtyard-based mid-rise is effectively zero in the Salem competitive set.

The category gap at West Salem is not a unit-type gap but a product-type gap. The 200 units of Phase 1A are calibrated against a competitive set that delivers none of this product. Studios at 475 SF, 3-bedrooms at 1,400 SF, and a unit-mix tilt toward families fits the Salem demographic that the market underdelivers.

II
Layout optimization · Variables that predict rent per SF

What renters most respond to, often without realizing it.

Within the constraints of location, size, and price, layout determines how a unit feels. Renters know when they love an apartment; they rarely know exactly why. The Win Shares method tests layout variables systematically against rent per SF in comparable buildings, identifies the variables that move rent the most, and makes those variables the organizing principles of the design.

20 to 30%Typical win share
Method

Test variables. Identify movers. Organize the design around them.

Test layout variables (living room width, kitchen configuration, daylight quality, window count and orientation, ceiling height, storage layout, circulation efficiency) against rent per SF in comparable buildings within market. Identify the variables with the strongest correlation to rent per SF, controlling for unit size and base price. Re-organize layout principles so the highest-moving variables are protected, not compressed.

Data sources

What powers the analysis

  • Comparable building plans (city filings, broker databases)
  • Published market rent data by floor plan type
  • Rent rolls where accessible through brokerage relationships
  • Internal layout-revenue modeling at unit level
  • Resident survey instruments at comparable buildings
Reference case · Union Channel, Brooklyn

Living room width was the strongest single predictor of rent per SF.

Wider living rooms allow two people to sit across from each other. They allow more windows and better light. They make a couch feel like a choice, not a compromise. Once living room width became the organizing principle, kitchen configurations, bar depths, and circulation patterns were calibrated around it.

Worked example · Now City West Salem

Daylight quality and the kitchen-courtyard sightline are the candidate primary variables.

The Scandi Block already organizes around the kid-safe interior courtyard with kitchens facing in. The Win Shares discipline tightens "we believe these matter" into "we tested these against comparable rent per SF performance," which both validates the layout choice and surfaces the next-tier variables to optimize.

III
Amenity selection · Quality over breadth

Which amenities actually correlate with rent. Which are checklist items the market discounts.

The industry assumption is that more amenities signal more value. The data does not support it. Renters do not compare checklists; they look for a few things they can picture themselves using. The amenity decision is which two or three amenities to invest in deeply, not which fifteen to deliver shallowly.

5 to 10%Typical win share
Method

Correlate amenity types to rent per SF. Pick depth, not breadth.

Run amenity-to-rent correlation studies across comparable buildings. Identify the amenity types with the strongest correlation. Specify those amenities to specialist standards, not generic specifications. Strip amenities that show no correlation. Document the choice and the alternatives considered. Track post-stabilization resident surveys to confirm or revise.

Data sources

What powers the analysis

  • Comparable amenity programs from leasing materials
  • Rent comp data segmented by amenity type
  • Resident survey instruments at comparable buildings
  • Social media engagement on amenity content
  • Specialist amenity-design consultants for execution
Reference case · Union Channel, Brooklyn

Fitness center quality had the strongest single amenity correlation with rent per SF.

Charney hired a specialist gym design consultant rather than designing in-house. Three squat racks, top-tier equipment, layout that uses every square foot. Resident surveys identified the gym (plus shared-amenity-campus access across all four properties) as the primary reason for 9 percent of leases.

Worked example · Now City West Salem

The 20,000 SF kid-safe interior courtyard, the daily market downstairs, and the cross-block flow are the amenity bets.

The Scandi Block deliberately invests amenity capital in three things: the courtyard (specified beyond market norms), the daily marketplace (Phase 1B activation), and the broader district amenity flow (basketball, sauna, pool, mini golf at full District scale). The amenity decision is depth on three things, not breadth on twelve.

IV
Neighborhood-led brand · Selling the place, not the building

Brand the neighborhood story. The building lives inside it.

A senior institutional developer told the Charney team that branding does not move rents. Their data disagreed. Twenty percent of Union Channel's leases came directly from social media, more than four times the rate on prior projects. The brand strategy was built around the neighborhood and the local culture, not the building specs.

5 to 10%Typical win share
Method

Anchor the brand in the neighborhood story. Partner locally. Generate organic content.

Identify the cultural assets, local producers, and civic stories that define the neighborhood. Partner with local cultural organizations and small operators (often through retail leasing). Generate organic content that features residents-to-be in the place rather than features in the building. Track conversion from organic content versus paid listing channels. Hire creative talent that has not worked the multifamily category, to break out of the format.

Data sources

What powers the analysis

  • Neighborhood demographic and cultural mapping
  • Local civic and arts organization directories
  • Social media engagement analytics by content type
  • Conversion data from organic versus paid channels
  • Resident origin survey at comparable lease-ups
Reference case · Union Channel, Brooklyn

Murals, retail-space-for-arts-organization partnership, local interview content.

Construction fencing became a mural canvas through partnership with a local arts organization, which later took retail space for pop-up exhibitions. Local artists, business owners, and community leaders were interviewed and featured. Three thousand organic Instagram followers before a unit was finished. Twenty percent of leases originated from social media.

Worked example · Now City West Salem

The Phase 1B Now City Market is the neighborhood-led brand strategy made physical.

The daily market generates the cultural content. The 22 vendors become the story. The activation precedes the residential lease-up by 12 to 18 months, producing real visitor and revenue data alongside organic social and earned-media content. This is the strongest single integration of the Win Shares brand category into a structural project decision.

V
Listing optimization · A/B testing the funnel

Test what is already in the listing. Do not assume.

The listings exist before any new spend. The category that produces the most overlooked lift is paying attention to what is already there. Cover photo, image type by unit type, copy framing, and channel mix all respond to systematic testing.

3 to 5%Typical win share
Method

A/B test cover images, copy, and channel mix by unit tier.

Run controlled A/B tests on listing cover images (architectural rendering, finished interior, lifestyle photography, amenity shots). Test copy framings against engagement and conversion. Match imagery to buyer profile by unit type and price tier. Apply systematically across every listing. Track conversion lift relative to baseline.

Data sources

What powers the analysis

  • Listing platform analytics (clicks, tours, leases by listing variant)
  • A/B testing tools for image and copy variants
  • Conversion analytics across organic and paid channels
  • Resident origin survey data
Reference case · Union Channel, Brooklyn

Lower-priced units converted on lifestyle imagery. Higher-end units on interior photography.

The rooftop pool rendering produced the highest overall engagement. Lower-priced units converted better from lifestyle imagery; higher-end units responded better to interior photography. Applied systematically, the lift produced approximately 10 percent more leads and five additional leases on cover photo testing alone.

Worked example · Now City West Salem

Build the listing-test protocol into Phase 1A's leasing plan from day one.

The Scandi Block has a strong rendering library and the courtyard imagery has natural emotional pull. The Win Shares discipline calls for systematic A/B testing across that library by unit tier rather than picking one cover photo and committing. Build the testing protocol into the lease-up calendar.

How the analysis runs

A four-step pipeline, applied identically to every project.

Win Shares is a method, not a one-off study. The same four-step pipeline runs at the start of every Now City Inc. project and on every Now City Labs client engagement that scopes for it. Outputs feed forward into design and decision documents, and post-stabilization attribution feeds the lessons back into the next project's pipeline.

1

Data assembly

Pull architectural plans from public filings. Map unit mix and amenity programs across the competitive pipeline. Pull rent comps, household composition data, and absorption studies. Build the project-specific data layer.

2

Gap analysis

Run the five Win Shares analyses. Identify supply-demand gaps. Test layout variables against comparable rent per SF. Run amenity correlation studies. Map the neighborhood cultural and demand drivers. Surface the listing-test plan.

3

Decision documentation

Each Win Shares decision goes into a documented memo with method, data, alternatives considered, and the call. The memo travels with the project file and informs design coordination, capital strategy, and the leasing playbook.

4

Post-build attribution

At lease-up and stabilization, attribute the value created back to the five categories. Compare actual win share to the projected win share. The lessons feed forward into the next project's data layer and analysis weights.

Where this gets deployed

One method, three contexts.

Win Shares runs on Now City Inc. projects as part of the Now City Stack's Phase 1 (Carrying Capacity and Opportunity Discovery). It runs on Now City Labs client engagements as a productized service. It runs on the West Salem JV project as the analytical floor of the partnership.

Now City Inc. projects

Built into the Stack.

Win Shares is the analytical layer of the Now City Stack's Phase 1 (Carrying Capacity and Opportunity Discovery). Every NCI project runs the four-step pipeline at site control. The outputs inform program design, capital structure, and the leasing playbook before any major capital is committed.

Deliverable: pre-development decision memo
Now City Labs clients

A productized service.

Labs clients (landowners, operators, mission-aligned capital) can engage Now City Labs for a Win Shares analysis on a specific site or pipeline. The deliverable is the same four-part decision memo, scoped to the client's project. Pricing is flat-fee per project for the standard analysis, with optional ongoing attribution at lease-up.

Deliverable: client-scoped Win Shares engagement
West Salem JV

The analytical floor of the partnership.

Win Shares runs on the West Salem project at the JV level, not just at NCI's level. The decision memos go into the JV file. Post-build attribution becomes the partnership's shared learning library. Phase 2 and District decisions draw on Phase 1A's attribution data rather than starting from intuition.

Deliverable: JV-shared analytical record
What powers Win Shares

Public data plus standard analytical method. No proprietary platform required.

Win Shares depends on data that any developer in any market already has access to. The competitive edge is not in proprietary data; it is in the discipline of asking better questions of the data. The list below is the data layer Now City Labs runs every analysis against. None of it requires a platform partnership, a SaaS subscription, or a dedicated tech vendor relationship.

Public filings and records

  • City building permit filings (architectural plans)
  • Land use and zoning records
  • County assessor data and parcel information
  • Public housing element and growth-management filings
  • Environmental and historic-resource records

Market data

  • MLS and rental listings (comparable rents, unit mix)
  • Census ACS demographic and household composition
  • BLS employment and wage data
  • FHWA and Census commute and travel data
  • Local absorption studies (ULI, broker reports)

Project-level instruments

  • Resident survey instruments (validated)
  • WHO-5 Well-Being Index (for QoL anchoring)
  • 15-Minute City scoring framework
  • WELL v2 framework (for health-impact composite)
  • Listing platform analytics and A/B test tools

Engagement and content data

  • Social media engagement analytics
  • Organic versus paid conversion analytics
  • Local cultural organization directories
  • Resident origin and channel attribution

Specialist consultant inputs

  • Specialist amenity-design consultants (per category)
  • LCA partners for embodied carbon
  • Local-multiplier consultants (per Shuman framework)
  • Insurance carrier underwriting letters

Internal Now City pipeline data

  • Cross-project unit mix, layout, and revenue data
  • Post-build attribution from prior projects
  • Operating partner performance data
  • The Outcomes framework's anchored metrics
The compounding effect

The platform that asks better questions becomes very difficult to compete against.

The five categories above account for roughly three quarters of the value created at lease-up at Union Channel. Each compounds into the next. Faster lease-up produces earlier stabilization. Earlier stabilization supports a better refinance. A better refinance frees capital for the next project. The next project starts with a richer pipeline data layer and tighter attribution weights than the last. The advantage compounds across the platform rather than reverting to mean each time.

Now City Inc. projects, Now City Labs client engagements, and the West Salem JV all run on the same four-step pipeline against the same publicly available data. The discipline is the differentiator. The data has been there the whole time.

Now City Labs · Pre-development strategy